<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Last Word</title>
	<link>http://xore.ca/blog/2005/12/the-last-word/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Morvock Emrys</title>
		<link>http://xore.ca/blog/2005/12/the-last-word/#comment-533</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:56:24 -0600</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xore.ca/blog/2005/12/the-last-word/#comment-533</guid>
					<description>From what I've seen, most arguments from any standpoint start as two apposing views inevitably turn into a fancy way of calling the other a dubass or some other profainity, and the one to say it in a blunt manner is then called the jerk by their peers and ostrisized from the group.

Arguments with siblings are generally worse though. I can almost never win arguments with one of mine due to the unholy amounts of bs he pulls in to the argument I can't even remember what it was about by it's end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>From what I&#8217;ve seen, most arguments from any standpoint start as two apposing views inevitably turn into a fancy way of calling the other a dubass or some other profainity, and the one to say it in a blunt manner is then called the jerk by their peers and ostrisized from the group.</p>
	<p>Arguments with siblings are generally worse though. I can almost never win arguments with one of mine due to the unholy amounts of bs he pulls in to the argument I can&#8217;t even remember what it was about by it&#8217;s end.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
